A key component of any new product sales forecasting model is that
which captures the number of repeat purchases made by each household over
time. When modeling repeat sales, it is very common to use the so-called
"depth-of-repeat" formulation which decomposes repeat sales into the number
of consumers that have made at least 1, 2, 3, ... repeat purchases. Perhaps
the best known depth-of-repeat model is a remarkably parsimonious framework
proposed by Eskin (1973) -- and further developed by Kalwani and Silk (1980)
-- that has been used in various academic and commercial settings.
Despite the historical popularity of the Eskin/Kalwani & Silk (E/KS)
model, very little is know about its properties. This paper provides validation
evidence for the model, using a simulation-based approach to examine its
capabilities across a wide variety of realistic market situations.
After briefly reviewing the E/KS model, we first examine its ability
to provide insights into the structure of the repeat buying process. In
a series of simulations for a simple stationary market, we show that the
model fares very poorly in this regard. In sharp contrast, we show that
the forecasting performance of the model, even under data conditions that
include different types of nonstationarity, is quite impressive. We systematically
vary three factors (length of calibration period, purchase cycle (fast
vs. slow), and degree of consumer heterogeneity), and find that the week
52 E/KS forecasts are remarkably robust. As expected, forecast accuracy
improves significantly as more data are available to fit the model, but
variations in the other two factors lead to relatively modest differences,
as measured by the absolute percentage error in the year-end sales estimates
as well as a measure of forecast bias.
We close with a brief examination of the simulated markets with the
worst forecasts, observing that they tend to be associated with highly
unsuccessful products (i.e., those with the strongest degree of consumer
rejection). Other conclusions and future research directions are summarized
as well.
|